The Region
Celeste wants to revise the law governing the Parks (Ticino, Orobie, Adda, and so on). In fact the current law is antiquated, have long been subject to partial modifications of other provisions, including transposition of EU directives.
Today, however, would affect the management of parks itself, reducing de facto autonomy.
Probably this is the chairmen of the parks already high rise lai? My answer is yes.
Today, however, would affect the management of parks itself, reducing de facto autonomy.
Probably this is the chairmen of the parks already high rise lai? My answer is yes.
It 's true, the autonomy of the Parks is curbed, and therefore those who presides Consortia, now set to become Government is right to complain. But ...
But the sincerity of the tears is not convincing, hence the title of the post.
It is not convincing because some President should, after serious examination of conscience, answer a simple question: "I managed all right?".
In that ' administered "there is not much, and not only the financial management of the park, but also awareness of the mission entrusted to the park itself: a mix of protection, protection, promotion , supporting the economy of agro-forestry and tourism. There is a perfect indicator to see if that mission was carried out, and is represented the satisfaction of citizens and businesses residing in the Parks, the more high the more it has demonstrated that the park was an opportunity, because the lower the more it must be acknowledged that an opportunity was wasted.
Now, the incumbent presidents (and their predecessors) have the credentials to be able to complain? Who administered a ghost Consortium, reaching more than one occasion to express intolerable in step with the bitterest enemies of the parks, how can today afford to move even a semblance of criticism of the new bill?
0 comments:
Post a Comment