Many, many! To the delight of the forums that Vallari light the candles at the altar of high altitude and Jupiter (De Benedetti). We are an army of
Cazzaro, no doubt, the more one is nonsense to say the greater the satisfaction of those who, on the contrary, it spreads the truth. So we can make him better, no?
you think about what they were publishing Leccoprovincia in February this year (oh, the remarks I have not sent me eh!): "Where the ratio of beds in hotels and second homes is the need to offer high quality proposals is obviously stronger. Valsassina In tourism is based very largely on the second house. In the absence of a strong hotel industry the incentives to diversify the tourism offer and qualify are heard less and less immediate. the houses are empty, hard to sell and even more to let that push to do something to restore value to the 'brick' . But if you plan to act only on the front of the ski to solve the problem but there is nothing that delaying a crisis more serious and profound. Also because they are not with other destinations on its hands ". Valsassina Replace well with Val Brembana, the effect does not change.
And with that statement if he came up the CAI (Lazio Regional Group) less than three months ago? Things' and crazy: "the data and scientific literature confirming the maturity of the" cross product "and the slump in the demand of the tourism resort, in place for nearly two decades global . In this framework, the scope for investment in infrastructure to restore, enlarge and improve ski runs and lifts are very small, especially in Italy, where there is already a clear oversupply of tourist facilities for alpine skiing [this statement, by the way , made her without too many outspoken commentator is also a forum of valleys, while welcoming the intervention of Foppolo] . The application focuses on a few large stations highly competitive, while smaller districts must implement innovative strategies for specialization in favor of precise targets (children, the local demand), integration of resources and environmental quality by restricting within narrow constraints economic feasibility of investment in infrastructure ".
Cazzaro, no doubt, the more one is nonsense to say the greater the satisfaction of those who, on the contrary, it spreads the truth. So we can make him better, no?
you think about what they were publishing Leccoprovincia in February this year (oh, the remarks I have not sent me eh!): "Where the ratio of beds in hotels and second homes is the need to offer high quality proposals is obviously stronger. Valsassina In tourism is based very largely on the second house. In the absence of a strong hotel industry the incentives to diversify the tourism offer and qualify are heard less and less immediate. the houses are empty, hard to sell and even more to let that push to do something to restore value to the 'brick' . But if you plan to act only on the front of the ski to solve the problem but there is nothing that delaying a crisis more serious and profound. Also because they are not with other destinations on its hands ". Valsassina Replace well with Val Brembana, the effect does not change.
And with that statement if he came up the CAI (Lazio Regional Group) less than three months ago? Things' and crazy: "the data and scientific literature confirming the maturity of the" cross product "and the slump in the demand of the tourism resort, in place for nearly two decades global . In this framework, the scope for investment in infrastructure to restore, enlarge and improve ski runs and lifts are very small, especially in Italy, where there is already a clear oversupply of tourist facilities for alpine skiing [this statement, by the way , made her without too many outspoken commentator is also a forum of valleys, while welcoming the intervention of Foppolo] . The application focuses on a few large stations highly competitive, while smaller districts must implement innovative strategies for specialization in favor of precise targets (children, the local demand), integration of resources and environmental quality by restricting within narrow constraints economic feasibility of investment in infrastructure ".
Heresy! Heresy! Burn him! Crucifige!
0 comments:
Post a Comment