note that some commentators criticize each other on the" signals "that the climate of the latter week would give them.
As far as I am concerned the weather does what it wants and is already a success that the meteorologists are able, with good reliability, to make predictions over the next three to four days.
Hoping to obtain sufficient evidence to draw future scenarios from one or two consecutive winters, however, is a bet whose odds of winning are lower than those to be to win the jackpot playing the lottery ticket from a one euro.
The weather is not an exact science, strives to be as credible as possible, and make its assessments and analysis of data series as widely as possible, over time (decades) and space (continents).
currently the most reliable theories in the course want it to be a slow but steady warming in different regions of the Earth, and Europe is among them.
Got it? There is talk of a continent, not a valley or a single region.
may like or not but average our winters are warmer and shorter than they were only forty years ago, and I challenge to prove them wrong age and anyone with sufficient memory. Then
"estimate" that the snow will fall in the Alps just over 3,000, the 2,000 or 1,500 meters is NOT a simple exercise. It 'an exercise of the outcome uncertain.
Then the point, in my opinion, is this: an investor, if not a pure financier (usually those who "play" with high-risk financial products) does not make bets, trying to invest on the safe side, especially if has realistic margins of return over five years (the story of the "patriots" saviors of Alitalia - at the expense of taxpayers - should have taught us anything, even the most optimistic). You think
seriously, that without bursting out laughing, that High Altitude has come forward because he believes in skiing and its miraculous ability to reward shareholders / partner with hefty dividends? Blessed are you Blessed are the simple, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
The ineffable company, put money (not his) in the operation claimed that we know and did so for a reason: the "Quadrello", in Italy, and always draws (as long as there will be suckers ready to bite at "your house at the foot of the ski lift ) will continue to pull.
What is the investment and, if things go as hoped High Altitude, sold the houses hello hello to all who have seen and we have seen arrangiatevi. Oh yes of course there is the Convention to "ensure" ten years of plant management. Time will tell. And I just want to see what will happen if AQ were to decide that "no, ten years is too long, I'm not going anymore," I want to see Comunello to sue in civil ah ah ah!
I close by indicating some links (of course there are hundreds) where you can explore the theme "climate." Warning: whatever the theory, taken in moderation and with caution.
science network
planat.ch
arctic travel magazine
geografia.it
Enea (14 Mb, you need fast connection)
As far as I am concerned the weather does what it wants and is already a success that the meteorologists are able, with good reliability, to make predictions over the next three to four days.
Hoping to obtain sufficient evidence to draw future scenarios from one or two consecutive winters, however, is a bet whose odds of winning are lower than those to be to win the jackpot playing the lottery ticket from a one euro.
The weather is not an exact science, strives to be as credible as possible, and make its assessments and analysis of data series as widely as possible, over time (decades) and space (continents).
currently the most reliable theories in the course want it to be a slow but steady warming in different regions of the Earth, and Europe is among them.
Got it? There is talk of a continent, not a valley or a single region.
may like or not but average our winters are warmer and shorter than they were only forty years ago, and I challenge to prove them wrong age and anyone with sufficient memory. Then
"estimate" that the snow will fall in the Alps just over 3,000, the 2,000 or 1,500 meters is NOT a simple exercise. It 'an exercise of the outcome uncertain.
Then the point, in my opinion, is this: an investor, if not a pure financier (usually those who "play" with high-risk financial products) does not make bets, trying to invest on the safe side, especially if has realistic margins of return over five years (the story of the "patriots" saviors of Alitalia - at the expense of taxpayers - should have taught us anything, even the most optimistic). You think
seriously, that without bursting out laughing, that High Altitude has come forward because he believes in skiing and its miraculous ability to reward shareholders / partner with hefty dividends? Blessed are you Blessed are the simple, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.
The ineffable company, put money (not his) in the operation claimed that we know and did so for a reason: the "Quadrello", in Italy, and always draws (as long as there will be suckers ready to bite at "your house at the foot of the ski lift ) will continue to pull.
What is the investment and, if things go as hoped High Altitude, sold the houses hello hello to all who have seen and we have seen arrangiatevi. Oh yes of course there is the Convention to "ensure" ten years of plant management. Time will tell. And I just want to see what will happen if AQ were to decide that "no, ten years is too long, I'm not going anymore," I want to see Comunello to sue in civil ah ah ah!
I close by indicating some links (of course there are hundreds) where you can explore the theme "climate." Warning: whatever the theory, taken in moderation and with caution.
science network
planat.ch
arctic travel magazine
geografia.it
Enea (14 Mb, you need fast connection)
0 comments:
Post a Comment